| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
20/08/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
20/08/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
BABIN, D.; LEONI, C.; NEAL, A.L.; SESSITSCH, A.; SMALLA, K. |
|
Afiliación : |
DOREEN BABIN, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI) - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Braunschweig, Germany.; CAROLINA LEONI VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDREW L. NEAL, Department of Sustainable Agriculture Sciences, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, United Kingdom.; ANGELA SESSITSCH, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Center for Health and Bioresources, Bioresources Unit, Tulln, Austria.; KORNELIA SMALLA, Julius Kühn Institute (JKI) - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Braunschweig, Germany. |
|
Título : |
Editorial to the thematic topic "Towards a more sustainable agriculture through managing soil microbiomes". |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
FEMS Microbiology Ecology, August 2021, volume 97, Issue 81, Article number fiab094. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiab094 |
|
ISSN : |
0168-6496 |
|
DOI : |
10.1093/femsec/fiab094 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 22 June 2021, Accepted 22 June 2021, Published 14 July 2021.
The workshop was co-organized and financed by Julius Kühn Institute (JKI, Germany) and the Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA, Uruguay), with additional support from Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura-Universidade de São Paulo (CENA-USP, Brazil). Doreen Babin was supported financially by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, Germany) in the framework of the project DiControl (http://dicontrol.igzev.de/; grant number 031B0514C) as part of the BonaRes initiative "Soil as a sustainable resource for the bioeconomy" (https://www.bonares.de/). Andrew Neal is supported by the United Kingdom's Biotechnology and Biological Science Research Council (BBSRC)-funded Soil to Nutrition strategic program (BBS/E/C/000I0310).
Corresponding author: Babin, D.; Julius Kühn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Messeweg 11-12, Braunschweig, Germany; email:doreen.babin@julius-kuehn.de |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT - Consistent with the concept of ecosystem sustainability - defined as 'the ability of an ecosystem to maintain its potential for self-regulation in the long term' (Bender, Wagg and van der Heijden 2016) -sustainable agricultural production aims to meet future food, feed and fibre demands with the given natural resources and without adverse environmental impact or greater land consumption. |
|
Palabras claves : |
Agriculture; Microbiota; Soil. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
URL : |
https://academic.oup.com/femsec/article-pdf/97/8/fiab094/38983715/fiab094.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02245naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1062362
005 2021-08-20
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0168-6496
024 7 $a10.1093/femsec/fiab094$2DOI
100 1 $aBABIN, D.
245 $aEditorial to the thematic topic "Towards a more sustainable agriculture through managing soil microbiomes".$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Received 22 June 2021, Accepted 22 June 2021, Published 14 July 2021. The workshop was co-organized and financed by Julius Kühn Institute (JKI, Germany) and the Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA, Uruguay), with additional support from Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura-Universidade de São Paulo (CENA-USP, Brazil). Doreen Babin was supported financially by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, Germany) in the framework of the project DiControl (http://dicontrol.igzev.de/; grant number 031B0514C) as part of the BonaRes initiative "Soil as a sustainable resource for the bioeconomy" (https://www.bonares.de/). Andrew Neal is supported by the United Kingdom's Biotechnology and Biological Science Research Council (BBSRC)-funded Soil to Nutrition strategic program (BBS/E/C/000I0310). Corresponding author: Babin, D.; Julius Kühn Institute (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Messeweg 11-12, Braunschweig, Germany; email:doreen.babin@julius-kuehn.de
520 $aABSTRACT - Consistent with the concept of ecosystem sustainability - defined as 'the ability of an ecosystem to maintain its potential for self-regulation in the long term' (Bender, Wagg and van der Heijden 2016) -sustainable agricultural production aims to meet future food, feed and fibre demands with the given natural resources and without adverse environmental impact or greater land consumption.
653 $aAgriculture
653 $aMicrobiota
653 $aSoil
700 1 $aLEONI, C.
700 1 $aNEAL, A.L.
700 1 $aSESSITSCH, A.
700 1 $aSMALLA, K.
773 $tFEMS Microbiology Ecology, August 2021, volume 97, Issue 81, Article number fiab094. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiab094
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
17/10/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
15/09/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
CUBBAGE, F.; MAC DONAGH, P.; SAWINSKI, J.; RUBILAR, R.; DONOSO, P.; FERREIRA, A.; HOEFLICH, V.; MORALES OLMOS, V.; FERREIRA, G.; BALMELLI, G.; SIRY, J.; BAEZ, M.N.; ALVAREZ, J. |
|
Afiliación : |
FREDERICK CUBBAGE, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; PATRICIO MAC DONAGH, Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNAM), Eldorado, Misiones, Argentina; JOSÉ SAWINSKI, Universidade do Contestado-Canoinhas, Canoinhas, Brazil; RAFAEL RUBILAR, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile; PABLO DONOSO, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile; ARNALDO FERREIRA, Consultant, Forest Genetics, Los Angeles, CA, USA; VITOR HOEFLICH, Embrapa Florestas and Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Brazil Curitiba, Brazil; VIRGINIA MORALES OLMOS, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA; GUSTAVO ALVARO FERREIRA DE MATTOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUSTAVO DANIEL BALMELLI HERNANDEZ, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; JACEK SIRY, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA; MIRTA NOEMI BÁEZ, Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNAM), Eldorado, Misiones, Argentina; JOSÉ ALVAREZ, CMPC Forestry, Concepción, Chile. |
|
Título : |
Timber investment returns for selected plantations and native forests in South America and the Southern United States. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2007 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
New Forests, 2007, v. 33, no. 3, p. 237-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-006-9025-4 |
|
DOI : |
10.1007/s11056-006-9025-4 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 3 April 2006 / Accepted: 15 October 2006 / Published online: 13 December 2006. |
|
Contenido : |
Timber investment returns were estimated for the principal exotic and selected native species in the Southern Cone of Latin America and in the Southern United States. Exotic eucalyptus plantations in South America were most profitable, with internal rates of returns (IRRs) ranging from 13% to 23%, followed by exotic loblolly pine, with IRRs from 9% to 17%. Average loblolly pine plantation returns in the US South were less profitable, with an IRR of about 9.5%, and natural forest management in the South had IRRs of 4% to 8%. Subtropical native species plantations of the best araucaria and nothofagus species had reasonable financial returns, with IRRs ranging from 5% to 13%. Subtropical or tropical native forests had fewer commercial timber species, and had much lower growth rates and returns.
Their IRRs were less than 4%, or even negative for unmanaged stands. State subsidy payments for forest plantations or for timber stand improvements increased IRRs
somewhat and reserving areas for environmental protection reduced their IRRs slightly. Including land costs in the cash flows decreased these internal rates of return
substantially. Natural stand returns in Latin America were much less than those of plantations, but management of those stands offered better rates of return than only
holding the land. |
|
Palabras claves : |
BIOLOGICAL AND FINANCIAL RISK; DESARROLLO TERRITORIAL; FINANCIAL ANALYSES; FOREST PLANTATIONS; LATIN AMERICA; NATIVE FORESTS; SECTOR FORESTAL-MADERERO; URUGUAY. |
|
Thesagro : |
AMERICA DEL SUR; EUCALYPTUS; FORESTACIÓN; INVERSIONES; MADERA. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
K10 Producción forestal |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/3570/1/New-Forests2007v33n3p237-255.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02683naa a2200445 a 4500
001 1051160
005 2020-09-15
008 2007 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1007/s11056-006-9025-4$2DOI
100 1 $aCUBBAGE, F.
245 $aTimber investment returns for selected plantations and native forests in South America and the Southern United States.
260 $c2007
500 $aArticle history: Received: 3 April 2006 / Accepted: 15 October 2006 / Published online: 13 December 2006.
520 $aTimber investment returns were estimated for the principal exotic and selected native species in the Southern Cone of Latin America and in the Southern United States. Exotic eucalyptus plantations in South America were most profitable, with internal rates of returns (IRRs) ranging from 13% to 23%, followed by exotic loblolly pine, with IRRs from 9% to 17%. Average loblolly pine plantation returns in the US South were less profitable, with an IRR of about 9.5%, and natural forest management in the South had IRRs of 4% to 8%. Subtropical native species plantations of the best araucaria and nothofagus species had reasonable financial returns, with IRRs ranging from 5% to 13%. Subtropical or tropical native forests had fewer commercial timber species, and had much lower growth rates and returns. Their IRRs were less than 4%, or even negative for unmanaged stands. State subsidy payments for forest plantations or for timber stand improvements increased IRRs somewhat and reserving areas for environmental protection reduced their IRRs slightly. Including land costs in the cash flows decreased these internal rates of return substantially. Natural stand returns in Latin America were much less than those of plantations, but management of those stands offered better rates of return than only holding the land.
650 $aAMERICA DEL SUR
650 $aEUCALYPTUS
650 $aFORESTACIÓN
650 $aINVERSIONES
650 $aMADERA
653 $aBIOLOGICAL AND FINANCIAL RISK
653 $aDESARROLLO TERRITORIAL
653 $aFINANCIAL ANALYSES
653 $aFOREST PLANTATIONS
653 $aLATIN AMERICA
653 $aNATIVE FORESTS
653 $aSECTOR FORESTAL-MADERERO
653 $aURUGUAY
700 1 $aMAC DONAGH, P.
700 1 $aSAWINSKI, J.
700 1 $aRUBILAR, R.
700 1 $aDONOSO, P.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, A.
700 1 $aHOEFLICH, V.
700 1 $aMORALES OLMOS, V.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, G.
700 1 $aBALMELLI, G.
700 1 $aSIRY, J.
700 1 $aBAEZ, M.N.
700 1 $aALVAREZ, J.
773 $tNew Forests, 2007$gv. 33, no. 3, p. 237-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-006-9025-4
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
